Effectiveness of a Korean Smart Home Modification Program: Focused on People with Physical Disabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of the Korean Smart Home Modification Program (KSHMP) on the activities of daily living and health-related quality of life of people with physical disabilities. The study used a single-group pre-post design with 10 people with physical disabilities living at home. During the intervention period, the KSHMP was implemented, which included occupational profile, smart home installation, setup, training, task-based feedback, and monitoring. Post-intervention changes in activities of daily living and health-related quality of life were assessed with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and EuroQual-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). After the KSHMP, all 10 subjects improved their activities of daily living and quality of life. In addition, the occupational performance of all subjects was maintained. These results show that a customized smart home has a positive impact on improving the activities of daily living and quality of life of people with retardation and is an efficient alternative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".