MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386941187 · doi:10.7202/1091549ar

OPTIONS AND SWAPS ON MOTOR CLAIMS

2016· article· fr· W4386941187 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Taehan Bae, Changki Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueAssurances et gestion des risques · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValuation (finance)LiabilityActuarial sciencePoisson distributionBusinessEconomicsEconometricsFinanceMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we introduce new motor insurance linked securities: motor loss rate ratchet options and motor loss rate swaps which can be used effectively by insurers to manage their liability risks by transferring loss rate risks to capital markets. We discuss the valuation of these customized over-the-counter hybrid securities under the assumption that motor insurance aggregate claims follow a compound Poisson distribution. The Fourier inversion method is employed for the numerical calculation of the risk neutral prices of the motor loss rate derivatives, and some illustrative examples are given based on a set of assumptions on the severity distribution and the model parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.487
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAssurances et gestion des risquesSame topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207