MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386941991 · doi:10.3390/cells12182324

Regulatory Mechanisms That Guide the Fetal to Postnatal Transition of Cardiomyocytes

2023· review· en· W4386941991 on OpenAlexafffund
Patrick G. Burgon, Jonathan J. Weldrick, Omar Mohamed Sayed Ahmed Talab, Muhammed Nadeer, Michail Nomikos, Lynn A. Megeney

Bibliographic record

VenueCells · 2023
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersQatar UniversityCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchQingdao University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsHeart diseaseTransition (genetics)Heart developmentMedicineMuscle hypertrophyNeuroscienceFetusHeart failureBioinformaticsInternal medicineBiologyEmbryonic stem cellPregnancyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heart disease remains a global leading cause of death and disability, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of the heart's development, repair, and dysfunction. This review surveys recent discoveries that explore the developmental transition of proliferative fetal cardiomyocytes into hypertrophic postnatal cardiomyocytes, a process yet to be well-defined. This transition is key to the heart's growth and has promising therapeutic potential, particularly for congenital or acquired heart damage, such as myocardial infarctions. Although significant progress has been made, much work is needed to unravel the complex interplay of signaling pathways that regulate cardiomyocyte proliferation and hypertrophy. This review provides a detailed perspective for future research directions aimed at the potential therapeutic harnessing of the perinatal heart transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.903
Threshold uncertainty score0.712

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCellsSame topicCongenital heart defects researchFrench-language works237,207