Targeted activation of human ether-à-go-go-related gene channels rescues electrical instability induced by the R56Q+/− long QT syndrome variant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: Long QT syndrome type 2 (LQTS2) is associated with inherited variants in the cardiac human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) K+ channel. However, the pathogenicity of hERG channel gene variants is often uncertain. Using CRISPR-Cas9 gene-edited hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs), we investigated the pathogenic mechanism underlying the LQTS-associated hERG R56Q variant and its phenotypic rescue by using the Type 1 hERG activator, RPR260243. METHODS AND RESULTS: The above approaches enable characterization of the unclear causative mechanism of arrhythmia in the R56Q variant (an N-terminal PAS domain mutation that primarily accelerates channel deactivation) and translational investigation of the potential for targeted pharmacologic manipulation of hERG deactivation. Using perforated patch clamp electrophysiology of single hiPSC-CMs, programmed electrical stimulation showed that the hERG R56Q variant does not significantly alter the mean action potential duration (APD90). However, the R56Q variant increases the beat-to-beat variability in APD90 during pacing at constant cycle lengths, enhances the variance of APD90 during rate transitions, and increases the incidence of 2:1 block. During paired S1-S2 stimulations measuring electrical restitution properties, the R56Q variant was also found to increase the variability in rise time and duration of the response to premature stimulations. Application of the hERG channel activator, RPR260243, reduces the APD variance in hERG R56Q hiPSC-CMs, reduces the variability in responses to premature stimulations, and increases the post-repolarization refractoriness. CONCLUSION: Based on our findings, we propose that the hERG R56Q variant leads to heterogeneous APD dynamics, which could result in spatial dispersion of repolarization and increased risk for re-entry without significantly affecting the average APD90. Furthermore, our data highlight the antiarrhythmic potential of targeted slowing of hERG deactivation gating, which we demonstrate increases protection against premature action potentials and reduces electrical heterogeneity in hiPSC-CMs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".