MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386951303 · doi:10.1109/lnet.2023.3307246

Guest Editorial Networking Enablers for 6G Use Cases

2023· editorial· en· W4386951303 on OpenAlexaff
Paolo Monti, Burak Kantarcı, Raouf Boutaba

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Networking Letters · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBroadbandLow latency (capital markets)Latency (audio)Computer scienceRoboticsPenetration rateMobile broadbandTelecommunicationsAugmented realityEngineeringComputer networkWirelessArtificial intelligenceRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Fifth Generation Communications (5G) has paved the way for various use cases including but not limited to networked robotics and autonomous systems, distributed and collaborative sensor/actuator technologies, personalized user experience and extended reality. 5G networking builds on three pillars to enable the accomplishment of these use cases: enhanced mobile broadband (eMBB), massive machine type communications (mMTC), and ultra reliable low latency communications (URLLC). While 5G has started to become a reality, the applications supported by these enablers require 100 microseconds at peak rate latency, 100 times faster speed and ten times higher penetration per square kilometer. Given these facts, a roadmap for the Sixth Generation Communications (6G) has been laid out aiming at Year 2030.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0110.017
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Networking LettersSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207