Tropical Cyclone Winds Retrieval Algorithm for the Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System Mission
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we propose a method for wind speed retrieval using a random forest (RF) algorithm for Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CYGNSS) data. We first compared CYGNSS data with Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) data and found a certain deviation in the CYGNSS ”young sea, limited fetch” (YSLF) data product for high winds. Then, we used SMAP as the ”ground truth” to train an RF model and applied it to the wind speed retrieval of CYGNSS data. The experimental results show that using the RF algorithm for wind speed retrieval can eliminate noise in the CYGNSS YSLF wind speed data and improve retrieval accuracy. In addition, we explored the impact of different input parameter combinations on model performance and found that using an 11-parameter model in CYGNSS wind speed retrieval can achieve optimal performance. This can provide valuable reference for rapid near-real-time retrieval of tropical cyclones using CYGNSS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".