MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386954881 · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105282

Intralumenal docking of connexin 36 channels in the ER isolates mistrafficked protein

2023· article· en· W4386954881 on OpenAlexaff
Stephan Tetenborg, Viktoria Liss, Leonhard Breitsprecher, Ksenia Timonina, Anna Kotova, Alejandra Jesús Acevedo Harnecker, Chunxu Yuan, Eyad Shihabeddin, Fatemeh Ariakia, Guoting Qin, Karin Dedek, Georg Zoidl, Michael Hensel, John O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Biological Chemistry · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Eye InstituteBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Institutes of HealthMcGovern Medical SchoolEuropean CommissionUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
KeywordsPDZ domainConnexinGap junctionCell biologyVesicleCytoplasmMutantBinding siteBiologyDocking (animal)ChemistryBiophysicsIntracellularBiochemistryMembraneGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The intracellular domains of connexins are essential for the assembly of gap junctions. For connexin 36 (Cx36), the major neuronal connexin, it has been shown that a dysfunctional PDZ-binding motif interferes with electrical synapse formation. However, it is still unknown how this motif coordinates the transport of Cx36. In the present study, we characterize a phenotype of Cx36 mutants that lack a functional PDZ-binding motif using HEK293T cells as an expression system. We provide evidence that an intact PDZ-binding motif is critical for proper endoplasmic reticulum (ER) export of Cx36. Removing the PDZ-binding motif of Cx36 results in ER retention and the formation of multimembrane vesicles containing gap junction-like connexin aggregates. Using a combination of site-directed mutagenesis and electron micrographs, we reveal that these vesicles consist of Cx36 channels that docked prematurely in the ER. Our data suggest a model in which ER-retained Cx36 channels reshape the ER membrane into concentric whorls that are released into the cytoplasm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Biological ChemistrySame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207