Bibliographic record
Abstract
The majority of women with repaired tetralogy of Fallot are able to tolerate pregnancy with a low risk of cardiovascular events. However, proactive contraceptive advice, prepregnancy counselling, and care by a pregnancy heart team with expertise in congenital heart disease are key to ensuring a good outcome for mother and baby. Maternal and fetal risks are increased in the presence of severe valvular stenosis, poorly tolerated arrhythmia, significant ventricular dysfunction, and cyanosis. It is unusual to see cyanotic adults with tetralogy of Fallot, whether unoperated or shunt palliated; pregnancy risks are greatly reduced by completing their repair before pregnancy is undertaken. The multidisciplinary pregnancy heart team should make a risk-stratified pregnancy care plan using a combination of published scoring systems and an individualized assessment of the patient's comorbidities. Low-risk patients may have the majority of their care and give birth in local units, whereas those at high risk should be managed and give birth in a tertiary centre with high-level expertise and intensive care facilities. Age-appropriate conversations about future childbearing and safe and reliable contraception should be part of routine follow-up from teenage years, so that women with tetralogy of Fallot can control their own fertility and make informed decisions about having children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".