Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The historical memory of the settlement of the Oregon Territory was crafted in a genre of memoirs published in magazines and newspapers in the decades around the turn of the 20th century. These narratives minimized the complexity of the events, smoothed over the contradictions and genocidal violence of settler colonialism, and erased the diversity of the participants. Microhistory deconstructs the singularity of large historical mythopoetics by contextualizing small scale events, interactions, and relationships, and is particularly appropriate to historical archaeologies that engage the primary documentation and materiality of war and conflict, where the events tracked by the archaeological record are particularly fine grained. I present three stories focused on the Rogue River war of 1855–56, an indigenous rebellion against American colonialism: how two Black settlers were killed defending their fellow settlers from Indigenous combatants, how a Métis person from eastern Canada helped lead the rebellion despite being thousands of miles from his home, and how a young military officer from Charleston, South Carolina, argued for the rights of indigenous people, despite being the son of the Governor of South Carolina and the owner of over 600 African slaves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it