Le rôle clé des indicateurs non-financiers dans le pilotage de la phase amont des projets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article étudie le rôle des indicateurs financiers et nonfinanciers dans le pilotage de la phase amont des projets. Une enquête par questionnaire a été menée auprès de 349 managers. Les résultats montrent que l’utilisation d’indicateurs pour piloter la phase amont des projets augmente significativement le taux de réussite de ces derniers. Néanmoins, si les indicateurs financiers restent davantage utilisés dans les entreprises de l’échantillon, seuls les indicateurs non-financiers contribuent significativement et favorablement à la réussite des projets. Ces résultats questionnent donc les pratiques des organisations et indiquent qu’elles devraient davantage utiliser des indicateurs non-financiers pour piloter la phase amont de leurs projets afin d’en assurer la réussite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it