MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rolling the Dice

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386959958 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Girard Dorsey

Bibliographic record

VenueCornell University Press eBooks · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNuclear Issues and Defense
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRocket (weapon)DicePolitical scienceWhite (mutation)Chemical warfareCold warHistoryEconomic historyLawPoliticsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter covers risking gas warfare in Europe. United States, Canadian, and British attitudes toward such things as white phosphorus and botulism helped shape the discussions and decisions about how to balance the risk and rewards of using chemical weapons during this period. Germany targeted British civilians with the Vengeance weapons in the aftermath of D-Day, so British leaders turned reluctantly to gas as a possible tool of retaliation and rocket destruction. The chapter explains that the Western Allied relationship continued to evolve, referencing the status of the United States, Canada, and Britain after the attack of Germany. It also tackles the war between Japan and the Western Allies that involved gas use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCornell University Press eBooksSame topicNuclear Issues and DefenseFrench-language works237,207