TURBULENT BORES–INDUCED SCOUR AND PORE PRESSURE VARIATIONS AROUND A VERTICAL STRUCTURE
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The scour due to the highly turbulent tsunami inundation is also a major threat to nearshore infrastructure [Nakamura, et al., 2008]. Research on local sediment erosion during tsunami events has shown a correlation between scour formation, pore pressure variations, and soil liquefaction [Mioduszewski and Maeno, 2003]. To understand the structures’ capacity to withstand the tsunami bores, it is critical to assess scour formation and pore pressure variations around their foundations [Macabuag et al., 2018, Nicholas et al., 2020; Mehrzad et at. 2021]. Young et al. (2008) conducted laboratory experiments to study tsunami induced liquefaction failure on a sand bed with two different slopes of 1V:5H and 1V:15H. The correlation between soil liquefaction and scour showed a direct link with bed slope and pore pressure and the peak pressure increased as the bed slope increased. Concerning the hydrodynamic forcing factor, research conducted by [Chanson, 2006] showed that the hydrodynamic characteristics of tsunami inundation can be adequately modeled using dam-break waves. The prime objective of this study was to comprehensively investigate the interaction of a wide range of hydrodynamic conditions and beach slopes on the variation of the pore pressure and associated scour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it