Assessment of the effect of inversion ankle sprain on the velocity capabilities of the dorsal and plantar flexors of the foot in a group of women
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The ankle joint, also known as the talocrural joint, classified as a hinge synovial joint, is formed by the complex articulation of the ankle, tibia, and fibula.The tripartite junction of the ankle, tibia, and fibula combine to form the ankle joint, which demonstrates the complexity of the human skeletal system.Up to 30% of all sports injuries are injuries to the ankle joint, and ankle sprains account for up to 70% of all injuries.Aims: This study aimed to assess the effect of inversion talocrural joint (ankle joint) sprain on the velocity capabilities of the soleus and dorsiflexor muscles of the feet in a group of women. Material and methods:The study group consisted of 33 young women.The experimental group consisted of 16 women with a history of inversion ankle sprain injury, while the control group consisted of 17 women without ankle sprain injury.All participants were tested using the ZPS4-U "JBA STANIAK" force measurement set.Results: In our study, the mean values of the maximum force gradient increase (MFGI) in the control group were higher for the dorsal flexors by approximately 13% compared to the plantar flexors.Variables characterizing the MFGI within the control and experimental groups and in intergroup analyses showed no significant statistical differences (p>0.05).Conclusions: Inversion sprain of the ankle joint does not affect the achieved velocity capabilities of the dorsal and plantar flexors of the foot in the study group of women.Taking into account the parameters analyzed, no statistically significant differences were found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".