Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tetralogy of Fallot is one of the commoner forms of congenital heart disease (CHD) with an incidence estimated at around 1 in 3000 live births. Its prevalence is roughly 5%-10% of all forms of CHD. Although it is a cyanotic disorder at presentation, early surgical repair has led to survival to adulthood in the overwhelming majority of cases. However-as with most repaired CHD-such patients are fixed, not cured, and will inevitably come to the attention of the imaging specialist. This article attempts to describe and summarize the main forms of repaired tetralogy that may be encountered in tertiary hospital imaging practice. The anatomy of different forms of tetralogy is reviewed, and relevant pathophysiology is discussed. Reference is made to 22q11 syndrome, which is often missed or not considered by even specialist congenital physicians, and the alerting features of this condition are reviewed. The benefits and challenges of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the congenital population are covered, and there is discussion regarding the various approaches to imaging available using these techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".