MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Provincial Separatism in the Late Twelfth Century: A Case of Power Relations or Disparate Identities?

2022· book-chapter· en· W4386974365 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueEdinburgh University Press eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicByzantine Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentity (music)PoliticsPower (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)BulgarianGenealogyHistoryPolitical sciencePolitical economySociologyLawPhilosophyArchaeologyAesthetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter discusses the rebellions of the Vlachs in the Balkans, of Isaakios Komnenos in Cyprus and of Theodore Mangaphas in Philadelphia during the turbulent last quarter of the twelfth. It seeks to clarify whether these rebellions belong to the category of provincial separatism and whether they can be regarded as the outcome of a ‘problematic’ relationship and disparate identity between the imperial centre and its provinces. It argues that the three cases should be considered as distinct, since the Vlach rebellion represented political separatism, Isaac Komnenos attempted usurpation, and Theodore Mangaphas provincial revolt. A disparate identity came into play only in the case of the Vlach–Bulgarians.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEdinburgh University Press eBooksSame topicByzantine Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207