IMAGINARIOS DE CIUDAD Y VIOLENCIA DE PAREJA EN BARRANQUILLA DESDE LA PERSPECTIVA DE GÉNERO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumenEn este artículo se pretende analizar las relaciones entre los imaginarios sociales, los espacios urbanos y la violencia, desde la perspectiva de género. Se toma este referente teniendo en cuenta que la violencia de género es en muchos casos la manifestación de conflictos preexistentes con fuertes bases en los imaginarios sociales, especialmente en estereotipos y prejuicios construidos a lo largo de la historia con respecto a las relaciones de pareja. Se aborda la problemática planteada desde diversas perspectivas, incluyendo las mujeres como agentes de violencia, puesto que se ha hecho evidente, en los últimos dos años, el aumento de la participación de las mujeres en hechos de violencia, en especial en situaciones de criminalidad. Este artículo es producto del Proyecto de investigación Imaginarios sociales, violencia y ciudad, desde la perspectiva de Género en Barranquilla de la facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales de la Corporación Universitaria Americana.
 AbstractThis paper aims to analyze the relations between the social imaginary, urban spaces, and violence from a gender perspective. This reference is taken considering that gender violence is in many cases the manifestation of preexisting conflicts with strong bases in the social imaginary, especially in stereotypes and prejudices built throughout history regarding relationships. It addresses the issues raised from various perspectives, including women as agents of violence, as has been evident in the past two years, increasing women’s participation in violence, especially in situations of crime. This paper is a product of social research project Imaginary, violence, and the city, from the perspective of gender in Ottawa Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at the American University Corporation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".