Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Kontsevich-Soibelman wall-crossing formula is known to control the jumping behavior of BPS state counting indices in four-dimensional theories with $\mathcal{N}=2$ supersymmetry. The formula can take two equivalent forms: a ``fermionic'' form with nice positivity properties and a ``bosonic'' form with a clear physical interpretation. In an important class of examples, the fermionic form of the formula has a mathematical categorification involving PBW bases for a Cohomological Hall Algebra. The bosonic form lacks an analogous categorification. We construct an equivalence of chain complexes which categorifies the simplest example of the bosonic wall-crossing formula: the bosonic pentagon identity for the quantum dilogarithm. The chain complexes can be promoted to differential graded algebras which we relate to the PBW bases of the relevant CoHA by a certain quadratic duality. The equivalence of complexes then follows from the relation between quadratic duality and Koszul duality. We argue that this is a special case of a general phenomenon: the bosonic wall-crossing formulae are categorified to equivalences of $A_\infty$ algebras which are quadratic dual to PBW presentations of algebras which underlie the fermionic wall-crossing formulae. We give a partial interpretation of our differential graded algebras in terms of a holomorphic-topological version of BPS webs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".