C9 (Clinical Case) Monkeypox Virus Infection in a 2-Month-Old Infant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction/Background The 2022 Monkeypox virus outbreak shed attention on an illness that is rare in non-endemic countries. Children are at risk of severe disease based on case series from previous outbreaks. Tecovirimat may be considered as a therapy in young children. Its efficacy and safety profile, however, have never been formally studied. This case report presents the first laboratory-confirmed case of monkeypox virus infection in a Canadian infant and its management. Case Description A 2-month-old infant presented to an emergency department with a vesiculopustular skin rash. A week before, parents noticed an eruptive cluster of 3 fluid-filled vesicles on the infant’s forehead. In the next days, vesiculopustular lesions appeared on his body. One spike of temperature was reported with no other sign of illness. On physical examination, a dozen umbilicated well-circumscribed vesico-pustules were observed with minimal skin inflammation. They ranged from 2 to 5 mm in size and were scattered over the face, trunk and limbs including palms and soles. In addition, 3 confluent crusted umbilicated lesions were present on the forehead. Discussion Differential diagnosis included varicella zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, and enteroviral infections. Empiric intravenous acyclovir was initiated pending specimen analysis. Bacterial culture and viral PCRs were negative on CSF and skin specimens. Due to transmission of monkeypox in the local adult population, orthopoxvirus was tested by PCR. The result was positive on a skin specimen and was later confirmed by the National Microbiology Laboratory of Canada. Because of the patient’s age and ongoing new lesions, tecovirimat was initiated. After 24 hours, new lesions stopped appearing and regression and crusting of active lesions were noted. Treatment was continued for 14 days without adverse events. Although parents denied similar symptoms, an epidemiological link was postulated, given work exposure in a setting with high risk of transmission in one of them. This case adds insight on the clinical features, the course of disease and management in infants. This 2-month-old infant did not develop any complication from the illness and was among the youngest patients with monkeypox to be treated with tecovirimat. Conclusion As monkeypox infection remains rare in children and may convey a higher risk for severe disease, a high degree of suspicion is warranted for clinicians caring for children. Monkeypox should be included in the differential diagnosis of an unexplained vesiculopustular rash. Finally, tecovirimat as a treatment for monkeypox infection in children was shown here to be safe and effective, even when started late in the evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".