91 The Association between Home Confinement during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Children’s Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables and Sugar-containing Beverages
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Children tend to gain more weight during summer breaks compared to the school year. It has been identified that school routines regulate obesogenic behaviours, as children tend to consume fewer fruits and vegetables (FV) and more sugar-containing beverages (SCB) during periods when they are not in school. During the COVID-19 pandemic, children’s daily routines were disrupted due to public health home confinement recommendations. Given the rise in childhood obesity during the pandemic, particularly among lower-income groups, home confinement may have affected children’s consumption of FV and SCB. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the association between home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic and the consumption of FV and SCB among healthy urban children. The secondary objective was to explore whether household income modified these associations. Design/Methods A longitudinal cohort study was conducted with repeated measures of outcome and exposure. The cohort consisted of children aged 1-12 years who were recruited during primary care visits, with questionnaire data completed between May 2020 and November 2021. The primary exposure was home confinement (days/week), defined as not going to in-person school or other public areas. The primary outcome was FV consumption (times per day). The secondary outcome was SCB consumption (cups/day), measured as the total consumption of 100% juice, sweetened beverage, and soda. Ordinal and linear mixed effects regression models were used to evaluate associations for FV and SCB outcomes respectively. Models were adjusted for child age, child sex, annual household income, maternal ethnicity, maternal age, and calendar time. An interaction term for household income was added to models and evaluated using ANOVA. Results 787 children were included in this study (47% female, mean age 5.55 years at baseline). There was evidence of an association between home confinement and SCB consumption (0.02, 95%CI: 0.01-0.02, p<0.001). After accounting for effect modification (p<0.01), this association was stronger among children from families with income <$50,000 CDN (0.04, 95%CI: 0.00-0.08, p=0.04) and $50,000-$99,999 CDN (0.04, 95%CI: 0.02-0.06, p<0.001), compared to those with family income $100,000-$149,999 CDN (0.01, 95%CI: 0.00-0.03, p=0.02) or >$150,000 CDN (0.01, 95%CI: 0.00-0.02, p=0.04). There was insufficient evidence to support an association between home confinement and FV consumption (OR 0.97, 95%CI: 0.94-1.01, p=0.15) or effect modification by household income in this association (p>0.99). Conclusion Home confinement during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with higher SCB consumption among children, which was more pronounced among lower income families. Potential competing interests Miss Mortazavi reported receiving award funding from Victoria College within the University of Toronto. Dr Maguire reported receiving grants from the CIHR, Ontario SPOR Support Unit, and The Joannah & Brian Lawson Centre for Child Nutrition at the University of Toronto. Dr Birken reported grants from CIHR, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Physician Services, The Edwin S.H. Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Centre for Additions and Mental Health, Ontario Child Health Support Unit, Walmart Canada, and SickKids Foundation outside the submitted work. Dr Malik reported receiving grants from the Canada Research Chair program, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, Connaught New Researcher program, and The Joannah & Brian Lawson Centre for Child Nutrition at the University of Toronto. No other disclosures were reported. Figure 1: Association between home confinement and consumption of sugar-containing beverages by annual household income.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".