Ballroom Dance in the Soviet Ukraine from the End of 1950s to 1980s
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the processes of formation and development of ballroom dance in Soviet Ukraine from the end of 1950s to the 1980s. It was demonstrated that ballroom dance in this period went through several stages of implementation of ballroom dances in the child and adult repertoire, formation of ballroom dance troops (clubs, studios, ensembles, etc.), construction of system of ballroom dancing “khudozhnia samodiialnist”, implementation of sport forms of competition, but with the mandatory “soviet program”. It was stressed that “soviet program” of ballroom dances is formed of dances which are made on bases of national dances, but with the principle of ballroom dance. For the creation of soviet ballroom dance as independent phenomenon which was opposing to the western ballroom choreography mechanism of national regulation and ideological pressure was applied. However, the fact of ballroom-sport dancing spreading in the USSR testifies to the processes of democratization and liberalization in art, extension of diapason of prohibited forms of art activity in the sphere of choreography.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".