O PAPEL DOS PAIS NO DESENVOLVIMENTO COGNITIVO DOS PACIENTES COM TEA: UMA REVISÃO DE LITERATURA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Conforme o Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais da Associação Americana de Psiquiatria - DSM-5, o Transtorno do Espectro Autista (TEA) é considerado um distúrbio global de neurodesenvolvimento que compromete na interação social e na comunicação, causando um comportamento restrito, repetitivo e estereotipado do indivíduo. Atualmente, o diagnóstico do TEA tem se tornado cada vez mais precoce, o que possibilita uma intervenção imediata e, consequentemente, um resultado mais rápido e efetivo para as crianças. Nesse contexto, foi realizada uma pesquisa nas bases de dados LILACS e MEDLINE, utilizando os descritores “Transtorno do Espectro Autista”, “Desenvolvimento Infantil” e “Pais”, associados ao operador booleano “AND”. Com isso, foram encontrados 05 artigos, sendo eles: 03 da LILACS, 01 da Index Psicologia e 01 da MEDLINE. Os estudos, então, resultaram na importância da atenção dos pais para desenvolvimento ampliado das crianças com TEA, as quais necessitam de um cuidado especializado para que a autonomia e convivência em comunidade sejam preservadas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.040 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.018 | 0.025 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".