MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386994590 · doi:10.2118/214728-ms

Field Validation: ESP Reliability Monitoring and Production Optimization by Trending Condition and Performance Data Extracted from ESP Surface Electrical Signals

2023· article· en· W4386994590 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amir Badkoubeh, Lovisa Waldner, Mehran Imanfard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReliability (semiconductor)Reliability engineeringCondition monitoringField (mathematics)Computer scienceWarning systemVibrationField trialPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringAcousticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the results of an ongoing extended field trial on multiple ESP systems in a SAGD field in Canada. The main objective of this field trial is to evaluate the impact of the condition monitoring technology introduced in this paper to address a gap in predictive and preventative maintenance programs for ESP applications. Specifically, the results are used to determine the ability to monitor and quantify the impact of (a) power quality, (b) adverse flow regime and (c) undesirable mechanical vibrations on ESP production and reliability using data extracted from electrical lines supplying the power to ESPs. The data collected from several wells on a single production pad were trended over several months to determine warning thresholds and subsequently operational recommendations to improve overall production and reliability performance. The information collected from this field trial is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness and benefits of this condition monitoring approach in the Operators field. The described condition monitoring technology is based on measurements of high frequency electrical signals, 3-phase current and voltage, from the VFD panel supplying power to the ESP. Previous SPE papers, SPE-201169-MS and SPE-204522-MS, covered the core concept and enabling components of this technology. These papers shows examples on mechanical, electrical and flow regime diagnosis and demonstrated a direct correlation between the periodic mechanical vibration in an ESP and the frequency component in the electrical current signals. This foundational work was largely the basis of the extended field trial discussed in this paper. The results, presented in this paper, demonstrate interesting findings in how this method of condition monitoring can provide meaningful insights into the operation and reliability of the operating ESP systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207