MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386995160 · doi:10.2118/214717-ms

Improving ESP Survivability in the SAGD Environment: An Integrated Approach to Managing ESP Performance in Challenging Conditions

2023· article· en· W4386995160 on OpenAlexaff
Rejish Joseph, T. K. Babatunde, Lisett Briceno, Fernando Gaviria, Bill Plaxton

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsSuncor Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurvivabilityReliability engineeringFailure mode and effects analysisReliability (semiconductor)Flexibility (engineering)Key (lock)Process (computing)Computer scienceComponent (thermodynamics)Asset (computer security)EngineeringRisk analysis (engineering)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Firebag SAGD (Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage) asset has shown steady growth in well count, with ESPs (Electric Submersible pumps) as the primary mode of lift. In the high temperature environment, robust design and material selections are important considerations to achieve long run lives. However, key constraints such as economic conditions, increasing well count and changing well performance require solutions that optimize cost and reliability. This is critical to offering flexibility in approaches to addressing the top failure modes of the ESPs at Firebag. The paper discusses Suncor's efforts to prioritize not only prevention, but also management of the key failure modes to optimize reliability and cost in the SAGD environment by developing a better understanding of the problem. This includes novel approaches to treat an installed ESP as a repairable system through cable-only replacement (non-serviced motor reruns) and re-landing an ESP as-is when a cable failure is located close to the surface. Risk mitigation is done primarily through data analysis of teardown information and statistical survivability rates at both the system and sub-component level. This risk mitigation includes building the foundation for information gathering through a clear teardown process on every ESP pulled from service, gaining insights on failures, challenging traditional assumptions based on the data obtained, and driving focused trials and initiatives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.438

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207