MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386997646 · doi:10.1016/j.cjca.2023.09.022

The Duality of Screening Mammography: Advancing Women’s Cardiovascular Health

2023· editorial· en· W4386997646 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Judy Luu, Natalie Dayan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Cardiology · 2023
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMammographyDuality (order theory)Mammography screeningScreening mammographyInternal medicineBreast cancerCancerCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, there have been substantial efforts by the medical community to reduce the cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden in women, as it remains a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in women worldwide.1 In developed nations such as the United States and Canada, the decline in cardiovascular mortality for women has stagnated since 2017, with mortality rates now increasing.2 Reasons for this trend are not clear, but may be related to disparities in identification, diagnosis, treatment, and underrepresentation of women in clinical trials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.054
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.054
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.004
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0440.041
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CardiologySame topicSex and Gender in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207