Application of Artificial Intelligence in Oncologic Molecular PET-Imaging: A Narrative Review on Beyond [18F]F-FDG Tracers - Part I. PSMA, Choline, and DOTA Radiotracers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has evolved significantly in the past few decades. This thriving trend has also been seen in medicine in recent years, particularly in the field of imaging. Machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and their methods (eg, SVM, CNN), as well as radiomics, are the terminologies that have been introduced to this field and, to some extent, become familiar to the expert clinicians. PET is one of the modalities that has been enhanced via these state-of-the-art algorithms. This robust imaging technique further merged with anatomical modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to provide reliable hybrid modalities, PET/CT and PET/MRI. Applying AI-based algorithms on the different components (PET, CT, and MRI) has resulted in promising results, maximizing the value of PET imaging. However, [18F]F-FDG, the most commonly utilized tracer in molecular imaging, has been mainly in the spotlight. Thus, we aimed to look into the less discussed tracers in this review, moving beyond [18F]F-FDG. The novel non-[18F]F-FDG agents also showed to be valuable in various clinical tasks, including lesion detection and tumor characterization, accurate delineation, and prognostic impact. Regarding prostate patients, PSMA-based models were highly accurate in determining tumoral lesions’ location and delineating them, particularly within the prostate gland. However, they also could assess whole-body images to detect extra-prostatic lesions in a patient automatically. Considering the prognostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET using AI, it could predict response to treatment and patient survival, which are crucial in patient management. Choline imaging, another non-[18F]F-FDG tracer, similarly showed acceptable results that may be of benefit in the clinic, though the current evidence is significantly more limited than PSMA. Lastly, different subtypes of DOTA ligands were found to be valuable. They could diagnose tumoral lesions in challenging sites and even predict histopathology grade, being a highly advantageous noninvasive tool. In conclusion, the current limited investigations have shown promising results, leading us to a bright future for AI in molecular imaging beyond [18F]F-FDG.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".