A mutualistic symbiosis‐like system: double‐layer nanofiber film incorporated <i>Lactiplantibacillus plantarum</i> for Mongolian cheese preservation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Hererin, the biopreservation (Lactiplantibacillus plantarum) was embedded into double‐layer nanofiber film (BDNF) composed of poly‐L‐lactic acid and polyethylene oxide via electrospinning process. Results showed that the embedded L. plantarum cells could manage to survive and maintain a high viability for about 15 days at 4 °C in the absence of external nutrients. The immobilisation of L. plantarum cells had no negative effect on their antibacterial activity. The application of BDNF on Mongolian cheese (MC) was constructed as a mutualistic symbiosis‐like system (MSS). Within BDNF‐MC‐MSS, nutritious matrix endowed L. plantarum a continuous antibacterial effect against undesirable microorganisms. Furthermore, the Mongolian cheese in MSS exhibited better quality because the packaging could strongly preserve them by inhibiting the growth of moulds and yeasts, reducing water loss, slowing fat precipitation, and improving texture characteristics during the storage period. The results suggested the feasibility of BDNF‐MC‐MSS as a novel way for Mongolian cheese preservation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".