MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386998581 · doi:10.1101/2023.09.20.23295790

Lack of genetic evidence for NLRP3-inflammasome involvement in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis

2023· preprint· en· W4386998581 on OpenAlexafffund
Konstantin Senkevich, Lang Liu, Chelsea X. Alvarado, Hampton L. Leonard, Mike A. Nalls

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNuclear Receptors and Signaling
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéCanada First Research Excellence FundNational Institutes of HealthParkinson CanadaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeVerily Life SciencesConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementMcGill UniversityPfizerCelgeneSanofiMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsDruggabilityDiseaseParkinson's diseaseGeneticsNeuroscienceComputational biologyBiologyMedicineGenePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

studies. Clinical trials targeting the NLRP3-inflammasome in Parkinson's disease are ongoing. However, the evidence supporting NLRP3's involvement in Parkinson's disease from human genetics data is limited. In this study, we conducted analyses of common and rare variants in NLRP3-inflammasome related genes in Parkinson's disease cohorts. We performed pathway-specific analyses using polygenic risk scores and studied potential causal associations using Mendelian randomization with the NLRP3 components and the cytokines IL-1β and IL-18. Our findings showed no associations of common or rare variants, nor of the pathway polygenic risk score with Parkinson's disease. Mendelian randomization suggests that altering the expression of the NLRP3-inflammasome, IL-1β or IL-18, does not affect Parkinson's disease risk or progression. Therefore, our results do not support a role for the NLRP3-inflammasome in Parkinson's disease pathogenesis or as a target for drug development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.226
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.124 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicNuclear Receptors and SignalingFrench-language works237,207