MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386998986 · doi:10.2118/214729-ms

Trials of VSD Electrical Signature Analysis Technology for ESP Vibration in High Dog Leg Severity Wells at Surmont

2023· article· en· W4386998986 on OpenAlexaff
Rylie Walters, Kyle Ehman, Kari L. Olson, Ashleigh P O'Reilly, J. E. Chacín, K. Nespor, Amir Badkoubeh, M. Imanfard

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOil and Gas Production Techniques
Canadian institutionsConocoPhillips (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignature (topology)VibrationRotor (electric)BendingState (computer science)Structural engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringAcousticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract ESPs operating in high dog leg severity (DLS) wells are prone to bending loads and vibration levels that may contribute to early failure modes such as shorted motor stators, rotor strikes and shaft breaks. Electrical signature analysis (ESA) has recently shown potential to identify the operating state of an ESP by analyzing high frequency data (current and voltage) captured at the variable speed drive (VSD). This paper shows how ESA helped identify the vibration under bending state on three ESPs installed sequentially in a well where the two previous ESP installs had failed prematurely. The premature failures occurred at a high DLS pump setting depth due to rotor strikes under bending. ESA contributed to an enhanced understanding of the operating conditions of ESPs and, in conjunction with other changes (such as ESP length, pump setting depth and operating frequency), helped to significantly extend the runtime of ESPs in this challenging well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOil and Gas Production TechniquesFrench-language works237,207