Bibliographic record
Abstract
La littérature sur les mouvements sociaux a montré que l’engagement dans une organisation militante, a fortiori un collectif qui promeut des transformations de modes de vie comme certains mouvements écologistes, est vecteur d’une socialisation secondaire. Les membres de ces collectifs font l’expérience d’un rejet de leur identité d’écologistes par leur entourage non engagé : leur engagement est perçu comme trop radical. Ils cherchent alors à s’engager en évitant toute forme de stigmate. Ce sont ces négociations que cet article s’attache à explorer, en étudiant ce qui se passe dans les interactions entre les individus engagés, leur collectif et les membres de leur entourage. À travers une ethnographie comparative d’un mouvement de jeunes et d’un écovillage, l’article montre comment les individus valorisent leur distance vis-à-vis de tout engagement trop catégorique par l’adoption de stratégies de pacification , qui visent à communiquer leurs choix de vie d’une manière qui soit acceptable par d’autres.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".