Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study publishes two paintings known only through documentary sources and studied in this perspective. Up to now, they had been considered to be lost. They are works by the Carraccis: an Annunciation by Annibale and a Herodias by Agostino and Annibale. The latter can be dated around 1589-90 and contributes to a better understanding of these two artists. Both paintings have a distinguished provenance, the Ludovisi Collection, considered the most important of Bolognese art. The same provenance has been traced for other paintings now in the Doria Pamphilj Gallery. After the Ludovisi ownership, the Annunciation was sought by some of the great collectors of the 17th century, notably King Philip IV of Spain, Paolo Francesco Falconieri and the Marquis Niccolo Pallavicini. This painting shown here to be related to a drawing in the Louvre, can be dated around 1593. This was Annibale’s very last period in Bologna following his first trip to Rome.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".