Electron microscopic investigation of precipitation hardening in Al-Si based alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present work was performed on Al-8.5%Si-1.75%Cu-0.55%Mg-0.2%Ti-0.32%Zr-0.015%Sr alloy (coded as 354 alloy) following T6 (at 160 °C) and T7 (at 240 °C) artificial aging conditions using high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM). The main results inferred from the present study are the precipitation of GP zones in samples aged for 20h at 160 °C along with S-Al2CuMg phase particles. Aging at 240 °C was carried out for different times, ranging between 30 min and 200h. The quenched structures revealed a series of precipitations mainly GP zones at low aging times to Θ’-Al2Cu after 200h together with the S-phase. No coherency was observed between the S-phase and the aluminum (Al) matrix. The growth of the S- phase takes place by precipitation of S2 type phase on the advancing S1-type phase. Mismatching was clearly observed at particle/matrix interfaces. High magnification images indicated the dissolution of some of the Θ’’ and Θ’ particles to enrich the nearby particles (coarsening).The start of incoherency is observed when the alloy is aged at 240 °C for 200h.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".