Transmission and Distribution Systems Coordination using the Design Structure Matrix
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proliferation of distributed energy resources (DERs) is radically changing power system infrastructure planning and operation paradigms. Moreover, DER impacts are reaching the bulk system level and causing a shift in roles and responsibilities at the transmission and distribution (T&D) interface. These changes necessitate active coordination and planning across the T&D interface. However, many research studies do not capture all aspects of function coordination and miss opportunities to minimize tasks repetitions and to improve overall systems’ operation efficiency. In this paper, we apply the design structure matrix (DSM) method to analyze and model the interdependencies of the T&D system interactions. Using DSM clustering and partitioning techniques, we systematically identify coordination opportunities to optimize grid planning. Effectiveness of the proposed DSM method is demonstrated by representing and improving the coordination of T&D operational functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it