MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387013370 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3312872/v1

Prevalence and predictors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare professionals in Sub-Saharan African region: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

2023· preprint· en· W4387013370 on OpenAlexaffabout
Abdulmujeeb Babatunde Aremu, Ismail Bamidele Afolabi, Alfred Owino Odongo

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScopusWork-related musculoskeletal disordersMedicineHealth careMEDLINEFamily medicineMusculoskeletal disorderEnvironmental healthHuman factors and ergonomicsPolitical sciencePoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: The Global Burden of Diseases 2017 found that musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are the second most prevalent cause of years lost to injury, although years of life lost are decreasing in low-income countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa. The objective will be to describe the regional prevalence of WMSD for different anatomical body areas and their risk factors in different health professions in the sub-Saharan African region. Method: We will search databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, AJOL, and Google Scholar for publications published between January 2002 and December 2022. The primary outcome will be the prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among health professionals, and risk factors related to WRMSDs will be the secondary outcome. Three reviewers will screen all abstract data, full-text articles, and all citations independently. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) will be used to assess the quality of eligible publications. Subgroup analysis will be conducted to explore the potential heterogeneity (e.g., age, sample size, gender, and occupational activities). Publication bias and heterogeneity will be assessed and reported using the appropriate tools. Discussion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide a synthesis of the literature on work-related musculoskeletal disorders and their predictors among health professionals in the Sub-Saharan Africa region. The consensus of data from this review will provide a regional view to help occupational health-related policymakers, healthcare professionals, and program managers in developing countries gain a better understanding of the prevalence, causes, and trends to build better evidence-based occupational musculoskeletal health and disorders prevention programs among various health professionals. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO, CRD42023455517

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.052
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.083
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0520.083
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0220.026
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0060.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Square→Same topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→