MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387016984 · doi:10.5817/ah2023-1-5

Obléhání hradu Kostomlaty

2023· article· cs· W4387016984 on OpenAlex
Milan Sýkora

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeologia historica · 2023
Typearticle
Languagecs
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsSemtech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesTheologyArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Studie se věnuje obléhání hradu Kostomlaty (okr. Teplice) v roce 1434 z hlediska písemných a hmotných pramenů. Hejtman husitského žatecko-lounského svazu Jakoubek z Vřesovic hrad obléhal asi tři měsíce a nakonec jej dobyl. V okolí hradu nacházíme dva areály obléhacího tábora, oba určené pouze k blokaci cest a hradu, beze stop po umístění dobývacích zbraní. Z detektorového průzkumu obou pochází menší množství nálezů zařaditelných do tohoto období.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.017

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it