MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387018980 · doi:10.3917/om.418.0143

Enseignement de l’arabe au Maroc, enseigner l’arabe en France : réciprocité et enjeux diplomatiques dans les relations culturelles franco-marocaines

2023· article· fr· W4387018980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOutre-mers · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

À travers une approche sociohistorique fondée sur la consultation d’archives diplomatiques durant la période 1957-1990, l’objectif de cet article est de montrer comment la coopération diplomatique entre deux États permet la circulation d’un modèle pédagogique. La réciprocité, inscrite dans les conventions bilatérales prône l’adaptation des programmes et leurs conformités avec les enseignements locaux. À cet égard, l’enseignement de la langue arabe en France et dans les établissements français au Maroc s’avère être une étude de cas pertinente. Tout en instaurant des cours d’arabe dans les établissements français au Maroc, les autorités diplomatiques françaises ne peuvent répondre aux volontés marocaines d’établir des établissements marocains en France. Les négociations entre les différents ministères n’aboutissent pas en raison d’un manque de moyens financier, matériel et humain qui conduit à la mise en place du programme d’Enseignement des Langues et Cultures d’Origine (ELCO).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it