MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387019753 · doi:10.3390/electronics12194027

Efficient Hyperbolic Perceptron for Image Classification

2023· article· en· W4387019753 on OpenAlexaff
Ahmad Omar Ahsan, Susanna Tang, Wei Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceArtificial neural networkPerceptronConvolutional neural networkPattern recognition (psychology)Feature vectorMultilayer perceptronFeature (linguistics)Flexibility (engineering)Euclidean geometryHyperbolic spaceEuclidean spaceMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deep neural networks, often equipped with powerful auto-optimization tools, find widespread use in diverse domains like NLP and computer vision. However, traditional neural architectures come with specific inductive biases, designed to reduce parameter search space, cut computational costs, or introduce domain expertise into the network design. In contrast, multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) offer greater freedom and lower inductive bias than convolutional neural networks (CNNs), making them versatile for learning complex patterns. Despite their flexibility, most neural architectures operate in a flat Euclidean space, which may not be optimal for various data types, particularly those with hierarchical correlations. In this paper, we move one step further by introducing the hyperbolic Res-MLP (HR-MLP), an architecture extending the attention-free MLP to a non-Euclidean space. HR-MLP leverages fully hyperbolic layers for feature embeddings and end-to-end image classification. Our novel Lorentz cross-patch and cross-channel layers enable direct hyperbolic operations with fewer parameters, facilitating faster training and superior performance compared to Euclidean counterparts. Experimental results on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and MiniImageNet confirm HR-MLP’s competitive and improved performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.851
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207