Architectural Characteristics of Expansion in Historical Mosques
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The identity of the first Islamic cities is clearly evident in its ancient mosques, and it is characterized by a continuous and always stable function, represented by prayer and other related activities, which necessitates its expansion due to the increase in worshipers.Through the historical and architectural description of the plans of the ancient historical mosques in which the phenomenon of expansion was applied, it becomes clear to us that the general problem of the research is the lack of clarity of the mechanisms and characteristics of expansion.The research problem is that the phenomenon of mosque expansion did not crystallize according to the architectural foundations that the designer can benefit from, represented in the formative and functional characteristics.The research aims to develop a studied strategy to reach the architectural characteristics of mosque expansion using the qualitative (historical) analysis methodology of historical mosques within the evaluation model and the accompanying addition of some complementary elements of expansion.The researcher concluded that most of the expansion works that were carried out on mosques were at the expense of the architectural characteristics that these mosques bear when trying to achieve a larger area without taking into account the principles of mosque expansion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it