Energy Generation Potential Through Cattle Manure Solid Phase Gasification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A common practice for cattle manure management, especially for farms with a small number of animals, is simply the separation of the manure solid phase from the liquid one and the subsequent spreading on the land.However, this biomass has a chemical composition similar to more valuable ones like woodchips, with the downside of the high ash content.For this reason, gasification of cattle manure solid phase in a small-scale gasifier was explored.Through this solution it is possible to provide both electrical and thermal energy to the farm, constantly throughout both the day and the year as opposed to other renewable sources like solar and wind power.In addition, a byproduct of this process is biochar, whose main application is in agriculture as soil improver and therefore it could be a valuable substitute of a fraction of the manure currently used as fertilizer.The quantity of manure available was assumed considering the typical size of an Italian dairy farm while the efficiency of the CHP system was calculated through an experimental test with a gasifier prototype.The results have been utilized for a basic comparison between the energy available through gasification and through anaerobic digestion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".