MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4387025401 · doi:10.32920/24192351.v1

Use of pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound to study the response of brain endothelial cells to mechanical injury

2023· preprint· en· W4387025401 on OpenAlexaff
Rajwinder Kaur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoxia (environmental)UltrasoundChemistryBiophysicsBiomedical engineeringMaterials scienceAndrologyMedicineBiologyOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigated the significance of a sublethal primary mechanical injury induced by pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound (pHIFU) and mechanical stretching techniques to mouse brain endothelial cell (bEND.3) nuclei in vitro followed by secondary hypoxia. The lateral size of the pHIFU beam’s focal spot (~ 1.7 mm) was obtained by characterizing the pHIFU system, and the transparency of the membrane on which the cells were to be cultured was determined theoretically and experimentally. Preliminary assessment of injury using a MTT assay (3-(4,5dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) at high acoustic pressures (3.15 MPa and 1.04 MPa for 50 ms) demonstrated cell damage. In the subsequent experiments, the cells were sublethally exposed to either pHIFU (0.57 MPa for 50ms) or stretch injuries (0.012 – 0.014 MPa for 50 ms). After each primary injury, the cells were either fully normoxic for 24 h or were subjected to a 6 h hypoxic environment followed by an 18 h recovery under normoxic conditions. The morphological parameters (area and circularity) of bEND.3 nuclei post-treatment were measured using an image analysis tool (ImageJ) for three primary treatments (control, pHIFU and stretch) and evaluated by plotting the scatterplots. Compared to the control group, a statistically significant decrease in circularity of bEND.3 nuclei was observed when the cells were subjected to 6 h hypoxia following a primary injury whereas nuclear area remained unchanged. The percentage of deformed nuclei also increased to ~ 19 % for pHIFU and stretch injury groups after 18 h normoxia following primary and secondary insult (6 h hypoxia), demonstrating cells’ inability to recover due to injury. However, when this hypoxic-normoxic regimen was not preceded by a pHIFU (or mechanical stretch) primary injury, nuclei recovered their original shape successfully. In conclusion, as shown in this study, cells became more susceptible to secondary hypoxic injury after being exposed to an initial mechanical insult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→