MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387036948 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3366971/v1

AICOM-MP: an AI-based Monkeypox Detector for Resource-Constrained Environments

2023· preprint· en· W4387036948 on OpenAlexafffund
Tim Tianyi Yang, Tom Tianze Yang, Andy Liu, Jie Tang, Na An, Shaoshan Liu, Xue Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicPoxvirus research and outbreaks
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsComputer scienceMonkeypoxMobile deviceMobile phoneArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide WebTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> Under the Autonomous Mobile Clinics (AMCs) initiative, the AI Clinics on Mobile (AICOM) project is developing, open sourcing, and standardizing health AI technologies on low-end mobile devices to enable healthcare access in least developed countries (LDCs). As the first step, we introduce AICOM-MP, an AI-based monkeypox detector specially aiming for handling images taken from resource-constrained devices. Following the precedent AI technologies built on existing monkeypox datasets, we have developed AICOM-MP with the following principles: minimization of gender, racial, and age bias; ability to conduct binary classification without over-relying on computing power; capacity to produce accurate results irrespective of images’ background, resolution, and quality. AICOM-MP has achieved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance. We have hosted AICOM-MP as a web service to allow universal access to monkeypox screening technology, and open sourced both the source code and the dataset of AICOM-MP to allow health AI professionals to integrate AICOM-MP into their services. Through the AICOM-MP project, we have generalized a methodology of developing health AI technologies for AMCs to allow universal access even in resource-constrained environments. AICOM-MP has achieved state-of-the-art results on mobile-phone based monkeypox screening. The methodology, which AICOM-MP summarized, can be generalized to other diseases, leading to the development of health AI engines for various disease screening usage scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicPoxvirus research and outbreaksFrench-language works237,207