Associations Between Plasma, Imaging, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers with Driving Behavior and Cognitive Tests: Implications for Biomarker Usefulness
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Declines in instrumental activities of daily living like driving are hallmarks sequelae of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although driving has been shown to be associated with traditional imaging and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, it is possible that some biomarkers have stronger associations with specific aspects of driving behavior. Furthermore, associations between newer plasma biomarkers and driving behaviors are unknown. Objective: This study assessed the extent to which individual plasma, imaging, and CSF biomarkers are related to specific driving behaviors and cognitive functions among cognitively normal older adults. Methods: We analyzed naturalistic driving behavior from cognitively healthy older drivers (N = 167, 47% female, mean age = 73.3 years). All participants had driving, clinical, and demographic data and completed biomarker testing, including imaging, CSF, and/or plasma, within two years of study commencement. Results: were associated with more speeding incidents, higher levels of CSF tau were related to shorter duration of trips, and higher CSF neurofilament light chain values were associated with traveling shorter distances, smaller radius of gyration, and fewer trips at night. We demonstrated that plasma, like CSF and imaging biomarkers, were helpful in predicting everyday driving behaviors. Conclusions: These findings suggest that different biomarkers offer complementary information with respect to driving behaviors. These distinct relationships may help in understanding how different biological changes that occur during the preclinical stage of AD can impact various sensorimotor and cognitive processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".