MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387045459 · doi:10.26685/urncst.502

TAC1 Gene Therapy in the Gut to Reduce Long-Term Memory Loss in Tg4-42 Alzheimer Diseased Mice: A Research Proposal

2023· article· en· W4387045459 on OpenAlexaff
Tyler Pereira

Bibliographic record

VenueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMorris water navigation taskHippocampusDiseaseWeight lossMedicineNeurosciencePopulationPsychologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that mainly affects a large percentage of the older adult population. AD can cause many problems, most notably long-term memory (LTM) loss. Many studies have observed a decreased level of substance P (SP) in the hippocampus of individuals with AD. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy to limit AD-related decline of LTM using probiotics transformed with SP. These transformed bacteria will contain varying concentrations of SP and will be injected into three different segments of the proximal colon in AD mouse models. LTM will be measured through Morris Water Maze (MWM) and Barnes Maze (BM) tests over three months to examine improvements in spatial memory. It is anticipated that this experiment will demonstrate that increased concentrations of SP in the proximal colon will result in the greatest reduction in LTM loss in AD individuals. This experiment will establish a new therapeutic option for AD individuals to slow the progression of LTM loss.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.175
GPT teacher head0.497
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUndergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) JournalSame topicMedicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionFrench-language works237,207