MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387047143 · doi:10.1038/s43247-023-00999-9

Long-term trends in carbon and color signal uneven browning and terrestrialization of northern lakes

2023· article· en· W4387047143 on OpenAlexafffund
B. Rodriguez-Cardona, Daniel Houle, Suzanne Couture, Jean‐François Lapierre, Paul A. del Giorgio

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Earth & Environment · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaHydro-Québec
KeywordsCarbon dioxideTotal organic carbonEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersDominance (genetics)WatershedDissolved organic carbonCarbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphereHydrology (agriculture)Environmental chemistryEcologyChemistryGeologyMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The widespread browning of northern lakes has been associated with long-term increases in dissolved organic carbon and color and should be linked to changes in surface water carbon dioxide, yet the long-term covariation in these three key carbon components of lake functioning remains to be assessed. We present long-term trends in dissolved organic carbon, color, and carbon dioxide from lakes, with generally positive but highly variable trends in organic carbon and a large degree of uncoupling with color and carbon dioxide. The highest rates of change in color and carbon dioxide were in lakes with greatest increasing dissolved organic carbon trends. Lakes with the lowest water retention times had greater increases and stronger coupling between all three parameters, coinciding with dominance of terrestrially derived carbon. These results suggest an uneven terrestrialization of northern lakes, where the increases and coupling in the three carbon components depends on hydrology and watershed connectivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications Earth & EnvironmentSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207