MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Agile Leadership in Navigating Change Management and Its Application Within the Food and Beverage Industry During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2023· book-chapter· en· W4387050592 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dewaine Alexander Larmond

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in human resources management and organizational development book series · 2023
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAgile software developmentDiversification (marketing strategy)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicBusiness modelAdaptation (eye)Political scienceBusinessPublic relationsMarketingManagementEconomicsMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter delves into the dynamic landscape of change management in modern business, unveiling actionable strategies. By synthesizing industry literature and expert insights, it underscores the paramount role of agile leadership, particularly in the challenging domain of the COVID-19 pandemic. Exemplary instances from various industries illuminate essential approaches adopted by leaders to ensure unswerving continuity, enhanced safety, and resounding success. The chapter centers around a prominent Canadian sports facility, where food and beverage revenue is pivotal, spotlighting the adept application of both Lewin's unfreeze-change-refreeze approach and Kotter's 8-step model for change. This analysis elucidates critical takeaways encompassing adaptation, diversification, transparent processes, technological integration, and the strategic elevation of health priorities—cornerstones for sustained viability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in human resources management and organizational development book seriesSame topicSupply Chain Resilience and Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207