Relationship Between Carotid Intima-media Thickness And Frailty Level In The CLSA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) provides an index of arterial injury. Frailty is an indicator of vulnerability to adverse health outcomes. It is unclear whether cIMT is associated with the multi-dimensional frailty index and/or if this relationship is age- or sex-specific. PURPOSE: To determine the impact of age and sex on the relationship between cIMT and frailty level in middle-aged and older adults. METHODS: Frailty and cIMT data were extracted from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging baseline comprehensive cohort of middle-aged (45-64 years) and older adults (>65 years) (n = 10,209). cIMT was assessed via high-resolution ultrasound. Frailty was determined using a 52-item index. Covariate-adjusted ordinary least squares regressions were conducted separately for middle-aged males (n = 3178), middle-aged females (n = 3125), older males (n = 2031), and older females (n = 1875). RESULTS: Average cIMTs were larger in older versus middle-aged adults and in males versus females (all, P < 0.001). Average cIMT was positively associated with frailty level in adjusted linear regression models in middle-aged males (adj. R2 = 0.09; β = 0.015 [95% CI: 0.005-0.026], p = 0.004), middle-aged females (adj. R2 = 0.11; β = 0.040 [95% CI: 0.025-0.054], p < 0.001), older males (adj. R2 = 0.12; β = 0.019 [95% CI: 0.004-0.034], p = 0.01), and older females (adj. R2 = 0.11; β = 0.020 [95% CI: 0.002-0.039], p = 0.03). These positive relationships between average cIMT and frailty remained in sub-samples of each age/sex group without any cardiovascular or cerebrovascular conditions (all, p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: cIMT was an independent contributor to frailty level regardless of age group (middle-aged/older adults) or sex, with the strongest effect observed in middle-aged females. Our cross-sectional study documents the independent relationship between a marker of cardiovascular function and an increased vulnerability to adverse health outcomes in middle-aged and older males and females.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".