Interconnectedness of Cryptocurrency Uncertainty Indices with Returns and Volatility in Financial Assets during COVID-19
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the dynamic relationship between cryptocurrency uncertainty indices and the movements in returns and volatility across spectrum of financial assets, comprising cryptocurrencies, precious metals, green bonds, and soft commodities. It employs a Time-Varying Parameter Vector Autoregressive (TVP-VAR) connectedness approach; the analysis covers both the entire sample period spanning August 2015 to 31 December 2021 and the distinct phase of COVID-19 pandemic. The findings of the study reveal the interconnectedness of returns within these asset classes during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this context, cryptocurrency uncertainty indices emerge as influential transmitters of shocks to other financial asset categories and it significantly escalates throughout the crisis period. Additionally, the outcomes of the study imply that during times of heightened uncertainty, exemplified by events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, the feasibility of portfolio diversification for investors might be constrained. Consequently, the amplified linkages between financial assets through both forward and backward connections could potentially compromise financial stability. This research sheds light on the impact of cryptocurrency uncertainty on the broader financial market, particularly during periods of crisis. The findings have implications for investors and policymakers, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive understanding of the interconnectedness of financial assets and the potential risks associated with increased interdependence. By recognizing these dynamics, stakeholders can make informed decisions to enhance financial stability and manage portfolio risk effectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".