MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sleep Deprivation Does Not Influence Whole-body Heat Loss During Exercise-Heat Stress In Young Men

2023· article· en· W4387053533 on OpenAlexaffabout
Nicholas J. Koetje, Brodie J. Richards, Kristina‐Marie T. Janetos, Fergus K. O’Connor, Glen P. Kenny

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSleep deprivationThermoregulationRelative humidityChemistryHeat stressInternal medicineCalorimetryDry heatEndocrinologyMedicineAnimal scienceCircadian rhythmThermodynamicsMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sleep deprivation has long been thought to modulate thermoregulatory function. Consequently, sleep-deprived individuals may be more vulnerable during exercise-heat stress due to impaired heat dissipation associated with reductions in sweating and skin blood flow. However, the effect of sleep deprivation on heat loss responses remains equivocal. Further, no study to our knowledge has evaluated whether differences caused corresponding changes in whole-body dry and evaporative heat exchange. PURPOSE: We evaluated whether 24-h of sleep deprivation modulates the relative contribution of whole-body dry and evaporative heat exchange during exercise-heat stress in young men. METHODS: On separate days, following a period of either normal sleep or 24-h of sleep deprivation, eight young men (mean [SD], age: 22 [3] years), completed three 30-min bouts of exercise at increasing fixed rates of metabolic heat production of 150, 200, 250 W·m-2 (to maintain a fixed thermal drive for heat loss), each separated by 15-min rest, in hot, dry conditions (40 °C, 15% relative humidity). Rates (W·m-2) of whole-body total heat loss (THL, dry + evaporative heat loss, via direct calorimetry), metabolic heat production (via indirect calorimetry) and change in core (rectal) temperature (ΔTrec, difference from pre-exercise resting) were measured continuously and expressed as peak responses (mean of final 5 minutes of exercise at the highest metabolic heat production). Responses between conditions were compared using paired t-tests (α = 0.05). RESULTS: No differences in whole-body dry (-52 [8] and -47 [9] W·m-2) and evaporative heat loss (270 [15] and 264 [12] W·m-2) were observed between normal sleep and sleep deprived conditions respectively (all p > 0.05). Similarly, no significant change in whole-body THL was observed between conditions (218 [10] and 217 [16] W·m-2), respectively (p > 0.05). Consequently, ΔTrec was not different between the normal sleep and sleep deprived conditions (1.0 [0.2] and 1.1 [0.2] °C), respectively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: These findings show that the contribution of whole-body dry and evaporative heat exchange on the resulting changes in whole-body THL during exercise-heat stress is not affected by 24-h of sleep deprivation in young men. FUNDING: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207