MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect Of Sleep Duration And Bedtime On Heart Rate Variability In Wildland Firefighters

2023· article· en· W4387053590 on OpenAlexaff
Jesse Wallace-Webb, Cory Coehoorn, Simran Purewall, Griffin Thomas, Katie Muirhead, Jeremy Angus, Lynneth Stuart-Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedtimeHeart rate variabilityActigraphyHeart rateMedicineSleep (system call)StressorCardiologyInternal medicinePhysical therapyCircadian rhythmBlood pressureClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildland firefighting requires continuous attention while exposed to long working hours and sub-optimal sleep. These stressors may induce higher levels of stress via autonomic imbalance, which poses a risk to worker health and safety. PURPOSE: This investigation examined the effect of sleep characteristics on heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) before and after shift. METHODS: An observational study was conducted on 15 wildland firefighters (6F) between July and September of the 2021 and 2022 fire seasons. Resting HR and HRV were measured directly upon waking (i.e. pre-shift) and before bed (i.e. post-shift) using a chest-worn monitor (Polar H10 + Ignite Activity Tracker). Sleep variables were measured via wrist-worn actigraphy (Polar Ignite). Separate two-way ANOVAs were performed to analyze the effect of sleep duration and bedtime on levels of HRV (RMSSD) and mean resting HR. Bedtime condition was categorized as <22:30, 22:30-23:30, or > 23:30. Sleep duration condition was categorized as >6.5 hrs, 6.5-7.5 hrs, or 7.5 hrs+. Shift condition was categorized as pre-shift or post-shift. RESULTS: Simple main effects revealed bedtime condition to have a significant effect on both HR (p < 0.01) and HRV (p < 0.05). Sleep duration condition had a significant effect on HR (p < 0.0001) but not HRV (p = 0.1153). Shift condition had a significant effect on both HR (p < 0.0001) and HRV (p < 0.0001). The only significant interaction effect found was between bedtime and shift conditions in levels of HRV (F(2, 225) = 4.3815, p < 0.05), such that HRV only appeared to be affected by late bedtimes in the pre-shift condition. CONCLUSIONS: Later bedtimes and shorter sleep were significantly related to higher resting HR, while later bedtimes were also related to reduced HRV the following morning. These indicators of automatic function suggest that impaired sleep between shifts may contribute to higher levels of stress, which has implications for worker health and safety. - Results of Two-way ANOVAs Condition SS DOF F-Value P-Value Shift & Bedtime: RMSSD Shift 13589 1 52.00 <0.0001 Bedtime 1771 2 3.39 0.0355 Shift : Bedtime Interaction 2290 2 4.38 0.0136 Shift & Bedtime: HR Shift 1445 1 20.03 <0.0001 Bedtime 1006 2 6.97 0.0012 Shift & Sleep Duration: RMSSD Shift 14148 1 52.04 <0.0001 Duration 1186 2 2.1807 0.1153 Shift & Sleep Duration: HR Shift 1717 1 24.08 <0.0001 Duration 1384 2 9.71 <0.0001

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicSleep and Work-Related FatigueFrench-language works237,207