MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

A Physical Activity Counselling Intervention Is Feasible And Acceptable To Children With Congenital Heart Disease

2023· article· en· W4387054948 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bianca M. Fukakusa, Mimi Kuan, Erica Bennett, Christine Voss, Kevin C. Harris

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyAttendanceIntervention (counseling)Psychological interventionWaistPhysical activityBody mass indexNursingInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Physical activity (PA) is an important modifiable cardiovascular risk factor in children with congenital heart disease (CHD). Evidence-based interventions are needed to optimally improve PA in children with CHD. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theoretically-based PA counselling intervention for children with CHD. METHODS: We designed a 12-week individualized, virtual PA counselling intervention based on behavior change theory. The intervention consisted of 6 sessions with a PA counsellor where participants learned tools for PA promotion through workbook activities. Children aged 9-12 yrs with moderate-to-complex CHD were recruited from BC Children’s Hospital in Vancouver, Canada. PA was assessed pre- and post-intervention via waist worn 7d accelerometry (ActiGraph GT3X LLC) to measure time spent in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) (Evenson 2008 cut points). Participants qualified for the intervention if they were not meeting PA guidelines, as measured by accelerometry, and expressed readiness to change PA, as measured by a questionnaire. Intervention feasibility (recruitment and retention) and acceptability (intervention compliance, optional participant interviews and surveys) were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty-three participants completed baseline measures (52% recruitment success). Of these, 12 participants qualified for the intervention (33% male, 10.8 [IQR 9.7-11.5] yrs) with a median MVPA of 37 min/d [IQR 22-46]. Seven participants have completed the PA intervention thus far. Study retention and session attendance have been high (82% and 100%, respectively) and workbook activities have been well received. Some participants increased their MVPA from pre- to post-intervention, but any group increase was not statistically significant (p = 0.438, 95% CI -5.2, 43.0). Interview themes included support systems, participant autonomy, and intervention challenges. All participants who completed the survey would recommend the study to other children with CHD. CONCLUSION: This PA counselling intervention is feasible and acceptable to children with CHD. Preliminary PA data suggests that the intervention may have facilitated increased PA for some participants. Funding: BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute Seed Grant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→