MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4387055590 · doi:10.1107/s2056989023007892

Growth and characterization of a new inorganic metal–halide crystal structure, InPb<sub>2</sub>Cl<sub>5</sub>

2023· article· en· W4387055590 on OpenAlexafffund
Michael Lewis, Ramjee Kandel, G. Schatte, Pengli Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic Communications · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOptical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materials
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanada First Research Excellence FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's UniversityCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsChemistryHalideCharacterization (materials science)Crystal structureMetalCrystallographyCrystal (programming language)Inorganic chemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new solid-state inorganic compound, indium dilead pentachloride, InPb 2 Cl 5 , was synthesized by melting InCl and PbCl 2 in a vacuum-sealed quartz ampoule. The ampoule was heated to 793 K and then slowly cooled to room temperature to induce crystallization of InPb 2 Cl 5 . InPb 2 Cl 5 crystallizes in the monoclinic crystal system adopting a space group of type P 2 1 / c , which is isostructural with other metal halides such as RbPb 2 Cl 5 , KPb 2 Cl 5 and TlPb 2 Cl 5 . The bulk InPb 2 Cl 5 exhibits a metallic black/grey colour, allowing it to be separated from white/yellow PbCl 2 crystals. Due to the incongruent nature of the compound, the pure bulk InPb 2 Cl 5 was not obtained. The black/grey InPb 2 Cl 5 crystals were characterized by powder and single-crystal X-ray diffraction. InPbCl 3 was also explored, however the growth was unsuccessful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.326
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section E Crystallographic CommunicationsSame topicOptical properties and cooling technologies in crystalline materialsFrench-language works237,207